INNsight · Industrialisation

The industrial product path: from TRL 1 to TRL 9

What happens at each TRL stage, what usually goes wrong, and where you burn the most resources without realising it. The TRL framework is universal, but how it applies to physical industrial products is a different game, and nobody tells you about it.

BASED ON 20 YEARS RUNNING INDUSTRIAL INNOVATION · 6 SECTORS READ ≈ 12 MIN · EN
01 · Why it matters

Why you need to know your project’s real TRL

The TRL framework is not academic bureaucracy. It is the common language that stops an R&D team, a finance department and an investment committee from speaking different languages about the same project.

The most expensive mistake in industrial product development is "almost there" syndrome. The technical team declares TRL 7 when the project is really at TRL 5. The consequence is that budget is requested to industrialise something that does not yet work in a relevant environment, suppliers are locked in and delivery commitments are signed. Six to twelve months later, the project goes backwards. The lost time is the visible part. The lost internal credibility is the expensive part.

TRL is also the language public funding demands. CDTI, ACCIÓ, Horizon Europe and the rest of the programmes ask for the project’s starting and ending TRL. An inconsistent declaration gets the application thrown out. An optimistic one commits you to delivering what you cannot. Knowing the real TRL is a precondition for asking for money with any judgement.

Knowing your project’s real TRL is not an academic formality. It is the difference between asking for budget with judgement and asking for it blind.

There is a structural reason why the nine levels are linear and cannot be skipped: each one validates something the previous level could not. Skipping TRL 5 and 6 — the relevant environment — and going straight from the lab to industrial manufacturing is the main cause of failure in physical products. What software fixes with a patch, hardware fixes with a new mould, a new regulatory validation and a new pilot run. TRL linearity is not a methodological whim. It is industrial discipline.

02 · Framework

The nine TRL levels, grouped into four stages

Click any node to open the detail. Inside the panel you can move with the arrow keys.
TIME COST Figures = % of the cycle maximum · bars above each node
03 · Quick diagnosis

Which TRL are you at?

Three questions · twenty seconds. For an honest estimate, not a marketing score.
Mini-diagnosis

A starting point, not a verdict.

These three questions place you in one of four bands. The result suggests, with no commitment, which vitamINN agents make most sense at your current stage.

Question 01 / 03

Have you built a physical prototype?

Question 02 / 03

Have you tested it with real customers, outside the lab?

Question 03 / 03

Do you have units in series production?

TRL 4–6Estimate based on your answers
Early industrialisation zone

You are where it hurts most: the jump from the lab to a relevant environment. This is where it is decided whether the product scales or stays a demo.

Recommended agents